Note
Mission mirroring
When the mission stares back: why civil society must confront its own conflicts
Civil society organizations (CSOs) exist to heal, advocate, and transform. They fight for human rights, protect the environment, nurture creativity, and promote peace. Yet, ironically, these same organisations often find themselves reenacting the very struggles they seek to overcome. This phenomenon—what David Allyn calls ‘mission mirroring’—is both painful and inevitable.
Mission mirroring happens when an organisation becomes internally entangled in the same issues it was founded to address: a group fighting ageism faces controversy over internal age discrimination, for example. Far from being rare, this dynamic is widespread across civil society.
Two key factors that make CSOs prone to mission mirroring:
- Passion begets vigilance:
These organisations attract people with highly attuned ‘radar’ for injustice. Staff and volunteers bring deep passion, lived experience, and high expectations for ethical consistency. Stakeholders expect CSOs to embody the highest standards of fairness and justice. When leaders fall short, reactions are sharper and conflicts more charged than in other sectors.
2. Every movement has a memory. Conflict makes it visible:
A non-profit professional’s commitment to values can sometimes blind them to their own contradictions. This creates what David LaPiana terms the nonprofit paradox: organisations recreating inside their walls the very ills they aim to cure. Moreover, personal tensions often reflect unmet needs and deeper longings. At the organisational level, mission mirroring shows how the struggles within a movement often echo the injustices it seeks to change.
The costs of avoidance
Too often, these conflicts are swept under the rug. Leaders worry that acknowledging internal dysfunction will harm their reputation with donors, boards, or the public. However, the costs of avoidance are high: staff burnout, talent loss, energy wasted on factionalism, and reputational risk when internal disputes spill outward.
Most importantly, unresolved conflicts prevent organisations from harnessing disagreement as a force for growth. Research across international CSOs shows that while 60% of staff see internal conflict as significant, only 5% believe their organisations manage it effectively. In other words, most CSOs live with unresolved tensions while missing the opportunity to transform them into innovation and resilience.
The upside of conflict
Conflict in mission-driven spaces is not just unavoidable—it’s a sign of vitality. As Allyn notes, disagreement is not evidence of failure but proof that people care deeply. The key is whether that energy is allowed to fester destructively or is channelled constructively.
Fowler, Field, and McMahon have argued for a Healthy Conflict Perspective (HCP)—an intentional orientation that treats conflict as normal, even desirable, for organisational life. Their research identifies four practices that can help CSOs reframe mission mirroring as an opportunity:
- Conflict-competent leadership – Leaders must model openness, engage disagreement early, and signal that dissent is not disloyalty. Even small gestures, such as welcoming tough questions and thanking staff for raising concerns, can shift the culture.
- Open and inclusive organisational culture – Create conditions where staff feel safe challenging the status quo, voicing unpopular opinions, and experimenting. Diversity of thought and background only adds value if it can be expressed without fear of retribution.
- Fair and effective processes – Establish transparent systems for handling disputes, from informal dialogue spaces to mediation options. Fairness matters as much as outcomes in preserving trust.
- Conversational competence – Equip teams with the skills to listen with empathy, speak with respect, and sustain candid dialogue even when disagreements run deep.
Rethinking conflict in civil society
For civil society professionals, mission mirroring should not be a source of shame but a reality check. When your organisation becomes embroiled in the very struggles it was founded to fight, it doesn’t mean your mission is failing. It means your mission is alive, powerful, and, like most human endeavours, complex.
The challenge is not to completely prevent conflict but to embrace it with courage and skill. By acknowledging mission mirroring as a “normal” feature of CSO life, and by investing in conflict competence, organisations can transform turbulence into safe places to work.
Conflict, after all, is energy. Channelled poorly, it corrodes. Channelled wisely, it fuels innovation, resilience, and deeper alignment with mission.